This distinct envision could have been really important in feminist beliefs. For-instance, More youthful retains that Spelman has actually definitively revealed you to gender realism try untenable (1997, 13). Mikkola (2006) argues this particular isn't really so. Brand new arguments Spelman tends to make don’t undermine the theory that there is some feature function, sense, popular updates or criterion you to definitely talks of women's gender; they simply claim that particular particular method of cashing out what defines womanhood is actually mistaken. Thus, whether or not Spelman is good in order to refuse those levels one falsely simply take the feature you to definitely conditions white middle-class Western feminists' gender so you can reputation ladies' gender typically, this leaves unlock the chance that women qua female perform express something describes their gender. (Pick together with Haslanger [2000a] to have a dialogue from why gender reality isn’t always untenable, and you can Stoljar having a dialogue out-of Mikkola's complaints off Spelman.)